Children of Empire: Peter Pan and the Seeds of Colonial Thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.5234Keywords:
Barrie; colonial; domesticity; empire; imperial; Peter and Wendy; postcolonial.Abstract
Children’s fiction often transcends its superficial framework as mere entertainment by implicitly addressing broader cultural, social, and political issues, which underscores its pedagogical function for young readers. This study examines the imperial ideology embedded in James M. Barrie’s Peter and Wendy (the novelistic adaptation of his 1904 play Peter Pan). It aims to show how the novel, through the enchantments of its fantastical world and militarised adventure, aestheticizes and implants colonial beliefs and tendencies in children’s imagination, especially Edwardian young readers. Through the conceptual lens of postcolonial theory, the research examines the imaginary setting in Barrie’s novel, Neverland, which functions as an imperial nursery. This fictional island invites the implied child reader to absorb colonial thinking, thereby fortifying Britain’s colonial project and expansionist ideology. The text’s racial perspective and the belligerence of its boy-characters are pivotal aspects nurturing colonial ideology by cultivating ideas of hierarchy and superiority in the empire’s youth. Furthermore, the article demonstrates how the author’s use of war games, caricatures and mimicry naturalises power structures within the child’s worldview, paving the way for imperial thinking. The novel’s definition of gender roles is also fundamental to understanding the imperial subtext through Wendy’s role as an imperial mother. The research concludes that Peter and Wendy envisions an imaginative habituation realm where the future generations of the British Empire can rehearse imperial practices, asserting their mastery over exotic colonial subjects and territories.
References
Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G., & Tiffin, H. (1989). The empire writes back: Theory and practice in post-colonial literatures. Routledge.
Barrie, J. M. (1911). Peter and Wendy. Hodder & Stoughton.
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
Birkin, A. (1979). J. M. Barrie and the lost boys: The real story behind Peter Pan. Yale University Press.
Bradford, C. (2007). Unsettling narratives: Postcolonial readings of children’s literature. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Deane, B. (2011). Imperial boyhood: Piracy and the play ethic. Victorian Studies, 53(4), 689-714. https://doi.org/10.2979/victorianstudies.53.4.689
Fletcher, R. (2012). The Art of Forgetting: imperialist amnesia and public secrecy. Third World Quarterly, 33(3), 423–439.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.657476
Hollindale, P. (1992). Ideology and the children’s book. In P. Hunt (Ed.), Literature for children: Contemporary criticism (pp. 19–40). Routledge.
McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial leather: Race, gender, and sexuality in the colonial contest. Routledge.
Nodelman, P. (2008). The hidden adult: Defining children’s literature. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pratt, M. L. (2008). Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Rose, J. (1984). The case of Peter Pan, or the impossibility of children’s fiction. Macmillan.
Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. Vintage.
Smith, M. J., & Bradford, C. (2011). The Victorian era in children’s literature. Palgrave Macmillan.
Spivak, G. C. (1994). Can the subaltern speak? In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 66–111). Columbia University Press.
Tatar, M. (2009). Enchanted hunters: The power of stories in childhood. W. W. Norton.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 أ.م.د. أسماء مهدي صالح، أ.م.د. زيد إبراهيم إسماعيل

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
