Stoic Ethics and the Virtuous Way of Life: A Study in the Texts of Seneca and Marcus Aurelius

Authors

  • Dr. Fatima Salah Abdul-Hassan University of Wasit / College of Arts – Department of Philosophy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.5627

Keywords:

Stoic ethics; virtuous life; Seneca; Marcus Aurelius; inner fortress; spiritual exercises; cognitive therapy; Stoic epistemology; emotions.

Abstract

This research seeks to investigate the ontological and epistemological structure of Stoic ethics and deconstruct its practical mechanisms as a methodology for the virtuous life and a psychological treatment for spiritual ailments. The central problem of the study is tracing how Stoic philosophy transitioned from its abstract theoretical character in the Hellenistic period to a rigorous clinical and daily practice in the late Roman era. This is achieved through an analytical and critical examination of the foundational texts of both the philosopher and minister Lucius Annius Seneca and the philosopher-emperor Marcus Aurelius.

The study adopts a qualitative methodological framework that integrates structural analysis of concepts, an interpretive approach to reading texts as spiritual exercises, and an intersectional contextual approach.  The research yielded significant findings demonstrating that Roman Stoicism laid the foundation for an epistemological revolution in understanding "emotions." These emotions were no longer considered blind, instinctual forces, but rather "erroneous intellectual judgments and beliefs" that could, and indeed should, be corrected to achieve a state of perfect tranquility (apate). The analysis also revealed the philosophers' ingenuity in resolving the dilemma of cosmic determinism through the invention of the concept of the "inner fortress," which rigorously separates external events, subject to fate, from the free inner will capable of interpreting those events.

The study further demonstrated that the invocation of the idea of "death" and the brevity of time in these texts was not a tendency toward nihilism, but rather a tool for awakening existence and focusing on the present moment.  Finally, the research concluded that the Stoic methodology of deconstructing emotions, restructuring knowledge, and reconciling individual autonomy with cosmopolitan duty is not merely a historical legacy, but rather constitutes the solid foundational structure of the most important contemporary psychological schools (such as cognitive behavioral therapy). This underscores the relevance of Stoic philosophy as a protective shield for individuals facing the crises of alienation and anxiety in the modern age.

References

المصادر باللغة العربية:

1- أمين، عثمان. (1945). الفلسفة الرواقية. لجنة التأليف والترجمة والنشر

2- أوريليوس، ماركوس. (2019). التأملات. ترجمة: عادل مصطفى. مراجعة وتقديم: أحمد عثمان. مؤسسة هنداوي.

3- بلحنافي، جوهر. (2007). الأخلاق الرواقية وتأثيراتها على المسيحية والفكر الإسلامي [أطروحة ماجستير، جامعة وهران]. مستودع جامعة وهران الرقمي.

4- بلحنافي، جوهر. (2014). الأخلاق الرواقية في الفكر الإسلامي (علم الكلام): مقاربة فلسفية. مجلة العلوم الاجتماعية والإنسانية، جامعة المسيلة، (6)،.

5- الحلواني، ناصر. (2019). الرواقية، مجلة حكمة، موسوعة ستانفورد للفلسفة.

6- سالزكوبر، ج. (2023). كتاب الرواقية الصغير: الحكمة الخالدة لاكتساب المرونة والثقة والسكينة (ع. اكنيوي، مترجم). مركز نماء للبحوث والدراسات.

7- سينيكا، لوكيوس أنايوس. (2020 أ). المغرب والانتقام. ترجمة: د. حمادة أحمد على. القاهرة: آفاق للنشر والتوزيع. (الطبعة 1).

8- سينيكا، لوكيوس أنايوس. (2020 ب). عن الغضب. ترجمة: د. حمادة أحمد علي. القاهرة: آفاق للنشر والتوزيع. (الطبعة 1).

9- نجاة، غيلاني. (2023). فكرة الضرورة في الفلسفة الرواقية (مذكرة ماستر غير منشورة). جامعة قاصدي مرباح – ورقلة، كلية العلوم الإنسانية والاجتماعية.

10- مناف حسين جعيول ا., & حامد حمزة حمد أ. د. (2025). غاية الاخلاق عند افلاطون. لارك, 17(4), 1318-1291. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.4681

المصادر باللغة الأجنبية:

1- Annas, J. (1993). The morality of happiness. Oxford University Press.‏ https://books.google.com/books?id=l4RMCAAAQBAJ&lpg=PR9&ots=LqUGfu40xe&dq=%5B2%5D%20Annas%2C%20J.%20(1993).%20The%20morality%20of%20happiness.%20Oxford%20University%20Press&lr&hl=ar&pg=PR4#v=onepage&q=%5B2%5D%20Annas,%20J.%20(1993).%20The%20morality%20of%20happiness.%20Oxford%20University%20Press&f=false

2- Aurelius, M. (2015). Meditations. Penguin.‏

3- Bamboulis, C. (2023). Ancient philosophy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).‏

4- Becker, L. C. (2004). Stoic emotion.‏

5- Brennan, T. (2000). Fate and Free Will in Stoicism: A Discussion of Susanne Bobzien, Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy.‏

6- Ferraiolo, W. (2011). Donald Robertson, The Philosophy of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy (CBT): Stoic Philosophy as Rational and Cognitive Psychotherapy: Karnac Books Ltd.: London, 2010, pp. xxvi+ 288. ISBN: 978-1-85575-756-1. US $30.00.‏

7- Hahm, D. (1977). Origins of Stoic cosmology. The Ohio State University Press.‏

8- Hicks, L. (2016). Cultivating What Self? Philosophy as Therapy in the Genealogy of Morals and Hellenistic Ethics.

9- Irvine, W. B. (2008). A guide to the good life: The ancient art of stoic joy. Oxford University Press.‏

10- Kamtekar, R. (2010). Marcus Aurelius.‏

11- Larson, V. T. (1992). Seneca and the schools of philosophy in early imperial Rome. Illinois classical studies, 17(1), 49-56.‏‏‏

12- Larson, V. T. (1992). Seneca and the schools of philosophy in early imperial Rome. Illinois classical studies, 17(1), 49-56.‏

13- Lee, T. K. (2022). Translation as experimentalism: Exploring play in poetics. Cambridge university press.‏

14- Leunissen, P. M. (1992). " The Meditations" of Marcus Aurelius: A Study.‏

15- Nussbaum, M. C. (2013). The therapy of desire: Theory and practice in Hellenistic ethics.‏

16- Parry, R., & Thorsrud, H. (2004). Ancient ethical theory.‏

17- Rauw, W. M. (2015). Philosophy and ethics of animal use and consumption: from Pythagoras to Bentham. CABI Reviews, (2015), 1-25.‏‏‏

18- Reydams-Schils, G. (2013). Philosophy and education in Stoicism of the Roman Imperial era. In Ideas of Education (pp. 38-51). Routledge.‏

19- Sellars, J. (2012). Stoics Against Stoics in Cudworth's A Treatise of Freewill. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 20(5), 935-952.‏

20- Sellars, J. (2019). Socratic Themes in the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Socrates, 293-310.‏

21- Sellars, J. (Ed.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of the Stoic tradition. New York: Routledge.‏

22- Seneca, L. A. (2007). Seneca: Selected Philosophical Letters: Translated with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford University Press.‏

23- Seneca, L. A. (2015). Letters on ethics: to Lucilius. University of Chicago Press.‏ https://books.google.com/books?id=AJMpCwAAQBAJ&lpg=PA101&ots=TxeZEosvDY&dq=%5B6%5D%20Seneca%2C%20L.%20A.%20(2015).%20Letters%20on%20ethics%3A%20to%20Lucilius.%20University%20of%20Chicago%20Press.%E2%80%8F&lr&hl=ar&pg=PA100#v=onepage&q&f=false

24- Stephens, W. O. (2006). The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. By Gretchen Reydams-Schils.‏

25- van Nunen, R. M. (2013). The Selfless Mind of Marcus Aurelius (Master's thesis).‏

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

Issue

Section

philosophy

How to Cite

Fatima Salah Abdul-Hassan, D. (2026). Stoic Ethics and the Virtuous Way of Life: A Study in the Texts of Seneca and Marcus Aurelius. Lark, 18(3), 480-465. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.5627