The Representation of China in U.S. Media Discourse in the Relevance of the Corona Pandemic: CDA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol1.Iss52.3334Keywords:
Social-Cognitive Approach, Critical Discourse Analysis, Coronavirus, Ideology, Twitter and Media DiscourseAbstract
This study examines U.S. media coverage of China, particularly U.S. President Donald Trump, during coronavirus events. The study employed the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) methodology to conduct the investigation. This study employs Van Dijk's (1998) conceptual framework of the ideological arena and social-cognitive approach. A total of ten tweets about the Corona crisis were gathered from the social media platform Twitter. These tweets were subsequently subjected to analysis using the Van Dijk model in order to derive meaningful findings. The research findings indicate that the President of the United States employed various rhetorical techniques, such as vocabulary selection, figurative language usage, assumptions, loaded phrases, and explicit claims, to portray China unfavorably to the general public. In addition, the individual strategically capitalized on a presidential disagreement with a political adversary to portray China unfavorably, in contrast to the actions undertaken by his administration. He portrayed it favorably.
References
References
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for diversity. In SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks (pp. 95–120). https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n5
Dezhkameh, A., Layegh, N., & Hadidi, Y. (2021). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Covid-19 in Iranian and American Newspapers. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies.
Mu, J., Zhao, H., & Yang, G. (2021). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Reports about China on the COVID-19 Pandemic in The New York Times. OALib, 08(08), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107746
van Dijk, T. (1993b). Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249-283.
Styaningsih, K. (2023). Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of Selected Covid-19 Headlines in The Jakarta Post News. Diploma thesis, Uin Raden Intan Lampung.
Akinwotu, S. A. (2013). A Speech Act Analysis of the acceptance of nomination Speeches of Chief Obafemi Awolowo and Chief M.K.O. Abiola. English Linguistics Research. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v2n1p43
Kreis, R. (2017). The "Tweet politics" of President Trump. Journal of Language and Politics, 16(4), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.17032.kre
Stolee, G., & Caton, S. (2018). Twitter, Trump, and the base: a shift to a new form of presidential talk? Signs and Society, 6(1), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1086/694755
Johnson, S. J. (2016). "Donald Trump, Disruptive Technologies, and Twitter's Role in the 2016 American Presidential Election." Widener Commonwealth Law Review 27, no. 1: pp. 39–82.
Oren, T., Ognyanova, K. & Lazer, D. ( 2016). "The Data behind Trump's Twitter Takeover." Politico Magazine.
Shane, T. (2018). The Semiotics of Authenticity: Indexicality in Donald Trump's Tweets. Social Media and Society, 4(3), 205630511880031. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118800315
Halliday, M. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional Grammar. In Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Johnson, M., & McLean, E. (2020). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (2nd ed.). Elsevier
Kobayashi, A. (2019). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, ideology, and Discourse. In Elsevier eBooks (pp. 728–740). https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-044854-2/00722-7
Van Dijk, T. A. (2018). Discourse and migration. In IMISCOE research series (pp. 227–245). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76861-8_13
Wodak, R. (2006). Mediation between Discourse and society: assessing cognitive approaches in CDA. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059566
Van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Discourse Analysis: Its development and application to the structure of news. Journal of Communication, 33(2), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02386.x
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352-371). Oxford: Blackwell.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lecturer Ali Flayyih Hasan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
