الروابط الحجاجية في كتب الرد على الإلحاد عند السيد هادي المدرسي (روابط العطف والتعارض إنموذجا)

Abstract

Arguments or dialectical connections belong to the concerns of dialectical theory at the level of language, or the so-called arguments in language, which we attribute their origin to Dekro and Enscomber, and which assume a dialectical function for their owners, and in the best cases a directive function of the argument in a word that does not include saying its traditional syntactic function. This study will explore the fact that these links not only provide the function of the argument or lead to directing the argument, but go further as they can be set without affecting the status of the argumentative results, and this means that their primary function is to achieve coherence and discipline in the guiding text, as well as Thus, sympathy is included as a type or form of argumentative cohesion by succession of arguments that serve a specific result, apparent or implied, as the sympathy bonds gather the scattered things and make them in an argumentative format at one pace, which helps the sender to convince the addressee, where the argumentative value lies in the succession and coherence of the arguments. As well as their coherence in place, as this study aims to demonstrate the synergy between the linguistic presumption of pilgrims through the links of sympathy in what was mentioned in the works of response to atheism of Mr. Hadi Al-mudaresi