A Pragmatic Study of Symbolism in Pope Francis’ Speech in UR During The Papal Visit to Iraq

Conference on Cultural Diversity, the Basis of National Integration, College of Arts/Wasit University 2022

Authors

  • Researcher Ghadeer Abdulhadi Jabur جامعة واسط كلية التربية , Wasit University / College of Education
  • Asst.Prof. Mazin Jasim Al-Hilu جامعة واسط/ كلية الآداب/ قسم الترجمة , College of Arts / Translation Dept.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol3.Iss46.2535

Keywords:

pragmatics, symbolism, implicature, conventional symbols, conversational symbols

Abstract

The current study is a pragmatic one which aims at exploring the symbolic language in Pope Francis’s speech in UR during his visit to Iraq in March 2021. Symbolic language means that languagewhich is not used explicitly and there is a mismatch between the sign and symbol, so it is the hearer’s task to infer the intended meaning. Hence, the current study attempts to find out what symbolism is and how and why it is used especially in Pope’s speech. In order to achieve this aim, six extracts are analyzed based on Grice’s theory of implicature and cooperative principle (1975). Based on the findings of the analysis, it is concluded that symbolismin language means using something to refer to something else for the purpose of fulfilling many functions since language as an action is used not  only to convey lexical or grammatical meaning, but also social meaning. Thus, it is observed that Pope’s speech is full of symbolism and meaning that is conveyed implicitly and full of symbolism which is used to reflect the his ideas in an implicit and indirect way to deeply affect his listeners and touch their hearts.

References

Al-Hilu, M. J. (2017). Complimenting Behaviour in the Performance of Irish English and Iraqi Arabic: A Cross Cultural Pragmatic Study. (Unpublished PhD Thesis). University of Limerick.

Birner, B. J. (2013). Introduction to Pragmatics. A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication.

Cohn, Robert G. “Symbolism”. The Journal of Aesthetic and Art Criticism. 33(1974):181-192.JSTOR. Web.

Grice, H. P.(1975). Logic and Conversation. Harvard University Press.

Habermas, J. ( 2001 ). The liberating power of symbols: Philosophical study. The M Palczewski, C., Ice, R. & Fritch, J. (2012) Rhetoric in Civic Life.Strata Publishing, Inc IT press.

https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/03/1086492#:~:text=The%20visit%20by%20Popeeeee%20Francis,touchdown%20in%20the%20capital%2C%20Baghdad

Levinson, S. C.(1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press

Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: an Introduction. (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

Murray, C. ( n.d.). Writing for English course: Symbolism in Poetry. City University of New York

Schnackenberg, A. K. , Bundy, J. ; Coen, C. ; Westphal, j. (2019). “Capitalizing on Categories of Social Construction: A Review and Integration of Organizational Research on Symbolic Management Strategies". Academy of Management Annals. 13 (2): 375–413. doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0096.

Sperber, D. (1974). Rethinking Symbolism. Cambridge University Press.

Tillich, Paul (1964). Theology of Culture. Oxford University Press.

Victory,WidyaRP.2010.ImplicatureUsedinHumors of Yes Man Movie. Unpublished thesis. Semarang: UMS. Retrieved 12 October 2011. from: http://lib.uin-malang.ac.id/ thesis / full chapter/06320107 -widya -rabiah -praja victory.pdf .

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

Issue

Section

Conference on Cultural Diversity, College of Arts / University of Wasit 2022

How to Cite

Ghadeer Abdulhadi Jabur , R., & Mazin Jasim Al-Hilu , A. (2022). A Pragmatic Study of Symbolism in Pope Francis’ Speech in UR During The Papal Visit to Iraq: Conference on Cultural Diversity, the Basis of National Integration, College of Arts/Wasit University 2022. Lark, 14(3), 552-536. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol3.Iss46.2535