Investigating Iraqi EFL College Learners’ Perception and Use of Causative Verbs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol1.Iss20.691Abstract
Causative verbs are used to indicate that one person causes a second person to do something for the first person. The causative verbs are : have, get, make (Croft, W. 2003:34) .
The present study aims at presenting the syntactic and semantic characteristics of causative verbs and investigating empirically the extent to which Iraqi EFL university learners’ master these characteristics. In addition, it aims at investigating the extent to which they can recognize and use causative verbs correctly; and their ability to differentiate the causative verbs from another types of verbs.
A test has been conducted to a sample of 100 Iraqi EFL university learners at their third and fourth year in the Department of English at the College of Education, University of Wasit during the academic year 2013-2014. The test has been exposed to jury members to measure its face validity.
Statistical means have been applied to the results of the test to investigate the perception and use of the college students in causative verbs. They have yielded certain conclusions that Iraqi EFL university learners at the third and fourth year face difficulties in perceiving and using the causative verbs. The rate of their correct responses in the whole test, (1291, 28.205%), is lower than their incorrect ones (3709, 71.795%). At the production level, the subjects’ incorrect responses (2434, 79.84%) reveal that they are unable to use causative verbs correctly whether syntactically or semantically. The difference in the rate of the incorrect responses of the perception (1275, 63.75%) and the use levels show that the learners of the third - fourth year face more difficulty at the use level than that at the perception one.
References
Educational Achievement, 5th ed. Boston: Allen and Bocon.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., and Leech, G. (2002). Longman student grammar of spoken and written English. Essex, England: Pearson Longman.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. and Finnegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex, England: Pearson Longman.
Brown, James Dean. 1987. Principles of Language Learning. New York: Macmillan.
Burns, Robert B. 2000. Introduction to Research Methods, 4th ed. London: SAGA Publications Ltd.
Carroll, Brendan J. 1980. Testing Communicative Performance: An
Interim Study. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Comrie, B. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology: Syntax and Morphology. p. 158-177. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Corder, S. P. 1967. "The significance of learners’ errors”. International Review of Applied Linguistics 5: 161-9.
Croft, W. 2003. Typology and Universals, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Davies, E. 1986. The English Imperatives. London: Croom Helm Ltd.
Dixon, R.M.W. and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald. 2000. “Introduction”. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, Dixon, R.M.W. and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, eds: 1-28. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R.M.W. 2000b. “A typology of causatives: form, syntax and meaning”. In Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity, Dixon, R.M.W. and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, eds.: 30-83. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ebel, Robert L. 1972. Essentials of Educational Measurement. New
Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Ellis, R., “The Study of Second Language Acquisition”, Oxford University Press, 1994.
Esser, U., “Fremdsprachenpsychologische Betrachtungen zur Fehlerproblematic im Fremdsprachenunterricht”, Deutsch als
Freiermuth, M. R., “L2 Error Correction: Criteria and Techniques”, The Language Teacher Online 22.06, http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp/jalt/pub/tlt/97/sep/freiermuth.html, 1997.
Fuchs, M. and Bonner, M. (2006). Focus on grammar 4: an integrated
skills approach. White Plains, NY: Pearson Longman
Gardner, R. C. and L. Gliksman. 1982. “ On “ Gardener on Effect”: A
Discussion of Validity as It Relates to the Attitude / Motivation
Test Battery: A Response From Gardener ” in Language
Learning Journal. Vol. 32, No. 1, June.
Goertz, G. et al. 2006. “Use of causatives in Navajo: Syntax and morphology.” In Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, Volume 18: Proceedings from the Ninth Workshop on American Indigenous Languages.
Harris, David P. 1969. Testing English as a Second Language. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Harrison, A. 1993. A Language Testing Handbook. London: Macmillan Press.
Hagège, C. “L’enfant aux deux langues” (The child between two languages), Greek translation, Polis editions, Athens 1999. (Original publication: Editions Odile Jacob, 1996).
Heaton, J. B. 1988. Writing English Language Tests. London: Longman.
Huang, S. and Lily I-Wen Su. 2005. “Iconicity as Evidenced in Saisiyat Linguistic Coding of Causative Events.” Oceanic Linguistics, Vol. 44, No. 2 (Dec., 2005): 341-356.
Mager, R.F. “Preparing Instructional Objectives”, Fearon Publishers,
Palo Alto, CA 1962.
Murcia, Marianne Celce (ed.). 1991. Teaching English as a Second or
Foreign Language, 2d ed. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
Porte, G. K., “Mistakes, Errors, and Blank Checks”, FORUM, Vol 31, No 2, p. 42, January-March 1993. (Online edition: http://exchanges.state.gov/forum/vols/vol31/no1/p42.htm)
Rice, Keren. 2000. “Voice and valency in the Athabaskan family”. In Dixon, R.M.W. and Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, eds. 2000. Changing Valency: Case Studies in Transitivity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J., “A non-contrastive approach to error analysis”, English Language Teaching 25: 204-219, 1971.
Shibatani, M. (ed.) (2001) The grammar of causation and interpersonal manipulation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Song, J.J. (1996). Causatives and causation: A universal-typological perspective. London and New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Song, J.J. (2001) Linguistic Typology: Morphology and Syntax. Harlow and London: Pearson (Longman).
Stenson, N. “Induced errors” in Shumann and Stenson (eds.), 1974, cited in Ellis (p. 60).
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics Volume 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics Volume 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge: MIT Press