Comparison of conventional approaches and the relationship between students’ academic and communicative achievement and communicative language instruction

Authors

  • Researcher: Hala Fadhil Farhan Dawood Al-Zubaidi Ministry of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.5722

Keywords:

communicative language teaching, conventional approaches, academic achievement, communicative achievement, EFL learners, communicative competence.

Abstract

This study is an investigation into the effectiveness of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) approach compared to traditional methods on academic achievement and communicative achievement of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners within Iraqi context. CLT differs from traditional instructional methods that typically rely on grammar explanation, translation, rote memorization and instructor-centered classroom practices by emphasizing communication through meaningful interaction via activities where students use the language for authentic communicative aims.

In the 2025–2026 academic year, two intact fifth-grade preparatory classes at an Iraqi governmental school in Baghdad were selected as a quasi-experimental design. The two classes were divided into one experimental group that learned using CLT principles and another control (unconventional) class. Method: The study sample included 80 student students from both groups evenly divided.

The research data were gathered using three tools, namely, an academic achievement test a communicative performance test and an attitude questionnaire. All statistical analyses were performed using independent-samples t-test, paired-samples t-test, Pearson correlation and simple regression analysis. The results showed that the mean scores of academic achievement and communicative achievement in the experimental group outperformed those in the control group at a statistically significant level. Results also showed a very strong positive correlation between academic achievement and communicative achievement because students with higher achievement in academics appeared to have better communicative ability.

Also, students' attitudes towards communicative language teaching as well are positive in the area of interaction, improved speaking ability, increased confidence and motivation. These results inform conclusions drawn about the ability of Communicative Language Teaching to enhance learners’ communicative performance while not reducing academic achievement. The study therefore suggests integrating the communicative activities in teaching EFL, providing opportunities for teacher training for CLT implementation, and adopting assessments that assess linguistics knowledge along with communicative performance.

References

References

Adem, H., & Berkessa, M. (2022). A case study of EFL teachers' practice of teaching speaking skills vis-a-vis the principles of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). Cogent Education, 9(1), Article 2087458. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2087458

AlShareef, S. N. A. (2024). Applying the communicative approach in assessing EFL young learners. English Language Teaching Educational Journal.

Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2-27). Longman.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second-language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment - Companion volume. Council of Europe Publishing.

Fauzi, N. I., & Ridwan, R. (2025). The impact of Communicative Language Teaching on English speaking skills. Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science, 6(3), 1774-1781. https://doi.org/10.38035/dijemss.v6i3.3819

Feng, M., Aziz, M. N. B. A., & Syarizan, D. (2024). Exploring the relationship between language competence and intercultural communicative competence among English as a foreign language learners: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 10(4), 671-684. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.10.4.671

Ho, Y. Y. C. (2020). Communicative language teaching and English as a foreign language undergraduates' communicative competence in Tourism English. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 27, Article 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2020.100271

Kang, T., & Pharanat, W. (2025). Enhancing English achievement through Communicative Language Teaching (CLT): Evidence from Guangxi Modern Polytechnic College. The EUrASEANs: Journal on Global Socio-Economic Dynamics, 5(54), 607-616.

Littlewood, W. (2014). Communication-oriented language teaching: Where are we now? Where do we go from here? Language Teaching, 47(3), 349-362.

Qasserras, L. (2023). Systematic review of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in language education: A balanced perspective. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(6), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.6.763

Richards, J. C. (2006). Communicative language teaching today. Cambridge University Press.

Savignon, S. J. (2018). Communicative competence. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. Wiley.

Teng, M. F. (2025). Communicative and task-based language teaching. The Language Learning Journal.

Wathawatthana, P., Hongsa, N., Phonchad, P., & Thambunrueang, T. (2025). Breaking the silence: The impact of the CLT method on Grade 12 students' speaking skills. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 13(2), 612-621.

Yu, M. H., Reynolds, B. L., & Ding, C. (2021). Listening and speaking for real-world communication: What teachers do and what students learn from classroom assessments. SAGE Open, 11(2), 21582440211009164. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211009164

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

Issue

Section

Western languages ​​and literature

How to Cite

Hala Fadhil Farhan Dawood Al-Zubaidi, R. (2026). Comparison of conventional approaches and the relationship between students’ academic and communicative achievement and communicative language instruction. Lark, 18(4), 1354-1329. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.5722