Mechanisms of Persuasion in Hebrew Advertisement A Pragmatic- Syntactic Analysis

Authors

  • Researcher: Samar Mustafa Hadi University of Baghdad, College of languages, Department of Hebrew Language
  • Assistant Professor Dr. Ghazwan Majeed Rasheed University of Baghdad, College of languages, Department of Hebrew Language

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.5040

Keywords:

Advertising, Advertisement, Pragmatics, Speech Act, Persuasion, Principles of Persuasion, Persuasion Strategies.

Abstract

The study examines the persuasive mechanisms in Hebrew advertisements through a pragmatic-syntactic approach, focusing on the relationship between linguistic structures and psychological influence. The research aims to analyze how advertisers employ language to shape consumer attitudes and decisions, distinguishing between “advertising” as a communicative activity and “advertisement” as its product. The study applies pragmatic theories, including speech act theory and persuasive strategies, to investigate how meaning is constructed beyond literal semantics to achieve communicative effectiveness. Using a qualitative approach, the research analyzes selected Hebrew advertisements to identify five covert persuasive strategies: fear appeal, euphemism, transfer, common ground, and repetition. The study explores how these strategies align with syntactic structures and speech acts to influence consumer perception. The findings reveal that advertisers strategically manipulate linguistic choices within a socio-cultural context to enhance persuasive effectiveness. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the role of language in advertising discourse and highlights the impact of linguistic and pragmatic elements on consumer behavior.

Author Biography

  • Assistant Professor Dr. Ghazwan Majeed Rasheed, University of Baghdad, College of languages, Department of Hebrew Language

    أستاذ مساعد دكتور غزوان مجيد رشيد

References

זאבי, ע', & סובר, א'. (ינואר 2014). הקופירייטר כיוצר שפת הומור שעשועי לשון, דו-משמעות ואניגמטיות בפרסומת הכתובה בישראל, 410. הומור מקוון(3), עמ' 63-83.

ניר, ר'. (1989). סמנטיקה עברית-משמעות ותקשורת (7-10).

סוברן, ת'. (2005). שפה ומשמעות. חיפה : אוניברסטת חיפה.

עבד, נ' פ', & רשיד, פ' מ'. (2 1 2022). הפרגמטיקה ופעולת־הדיבור- התולדות, החשיבות ושלבי ההתפתחות. Journal of the College of Languages, עמ' 394-419. https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2022.0.45.0394

צור, נ'. (2004). רטוריקה פוליטית מנהיגים ישראלים במצבי לחץ. ישראל: by Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing House Ltd.

צרפתי, ג' ב'-ע'. (1997). כלשון עמי (עיונים בלשון העברית). ירושלים.

רשיד, ר' מ'. (2015). הפונקציה של המטפורה בדיסקורס הפוליטי הישראילי יוסי שריד לדוגמה.

Abed, A. K., & Jebur, H. N. (2022, Oct 1). Flouting Grice's Maxims in Some Selected Clean Jokes: A Pragmatic Study. Lark Journal, 4, pp. 1060-1075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31185/ .

Almuslehi, M. A., & I. Al-Utbi, P. (2021). A Socio-Pragmatic Analysis of Responses to Impoliteness in some Selected English and Arabic Literary Texts. Al-Adab Journal, pp. 11-22 . https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i136.1278

Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. (1979). Effects of Message Repetition and Position on Cognitive Response, Recall, and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, p. 98. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97

Cegala, D. (1987). Persuasive Communiction:Theory and Practice (Vol. 3). Edina: MN:Burgess International.

Cialdini, R. (2001). Influence: Science and Practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

E.Shabo, M. (2008). Techniques of Propaganda and Persuasion. United States: Prestwicked house.

Haryani, S. (2017, October). A PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH ADVERTISEMENTS A CASE STUDY. Bangun Rekaprima, 3, pp. 22-32.

Hassan, A. H., & Mahmood, Z. (2018). A Psycho-Pragmatic Study of Self-Identity of Kurdish EFL Learners in Kurdistan Region. English Language Teaching, 11, pp. 99-112. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n2p99.

Hogan, K., & Speakman, J. (2006). Covert Persuasion: Psychological Tactics and Tricks to Win the Game. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Jameel, A. F. (2024). A Pragmatic Study of Irony in TV Shows. Alustath Journal, 1, pp. 80-94. DOI: 10.36473/4j1cpb31.

Janam, I. J. (2019, 7 24). A Critical Discourse Analysis ofthe Language of Persuasion Used in the Election Campaigns by AmericanParliaments. Al-Ustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, 4, pp. 33-46. DOI: 10.36473/ujhss.v58i4.1017.

Larson, C. (2013). Persuasion: Reception and Responsibility (Vol. 10). United States, Thomson Wadsworth.

Majumdar, S. D. (2006). The Linguistic Patterns of Advertising Text:A Study in Kolkata. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 5(2), p. 228.

MounirA.S. (2023, February 24). Comparative Study on Advertising as a Means of Communications; its Issues and Characteristics. Studies in Linguistics and Literature, 7, pp. 104-117. DOI:10.22158/sll.v7n1p104 .

O'Donnell, V., & Kable, J. (1982). Persuasion: An Interactive-dependency Approach. New York: Random House.

Rahimi, A., & Sahragard, R. (2006, June). A critical discourse analysis of euphemization and derogation on the emails written on the death of the Pope. Linguistics Journal Press, 1, pp. 29-87.

Rashid, A. M., & Al-Ghezzey, A. H. (2023, Jan 1). A Pragmatic Study of Implicature in Iraqi's Election Propaganda Posters. Lark Journal, 1, pp. 882- 898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31185/.

Richardson, J. (2007). Analysing Newspapers: an approach from critical. Houndmills: Palgrave

https://catalogimages.wiley.com.

https://learn.rumie.org.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

Issue

Section

Oriental languages ​​and literature

How to Cite

Samar Mustafa Hadi, R., & Ghazwan Majeed Rasheed, A. P. D. (2026). Mechanisms of Persuasion in Hebrew Advertisement A Pragmatic- Syntactic Analysis. Lark, 18(1), 1363-1352. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.5040