Team Teaching Instruction Effectiveness on ESP Students’ Achievement in New Headway Plus Book for Beginners

Authors

  • Asst. Prof. Dr. Hanan Dhia Alsalihi University of Baghdad/College of Education for Women/Department of English , قسم اللغة الإنكليزية، كلية التربية للبنات، جامعة بغداد، العراق

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.4319

Keywords:

effectiveness, engagement, ESP, New Headway Plus Book, students’ achievement, team teaching

Abstract

ESP students frequently struggle to acquire English because of the complex vocabulary and grammar, which can be intimidating for newcomers. These issues could not be sufficiently addressed by traditional teaching approaches, nor may they offer enough involvement or support. Additionally, the majority of EFL teachers find it difficult to instruct their students effectively because of class congestion, differences in student needs, and discrepancies in student performance. This study investigates the effectiveness of team teaching instruction on the achievement of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) students using the New Headway Plus book for beginners. It aims to: evaluate the effectiveness of team teaching on ESP students’ achievement in English, compare the performance of students taught through team teaching with those taught through traditional methods and explore students’ engagement through team teaching classes. 
A quasi-experimental design was used. The research was conducted with two groups of (60) first-level students from the College of Education for Women, Department of Social Work, who were studying English as part of their ESP curriculum. The experimental group was taught using a team teaching approach, while the control group received traditional instruction. Pre-test was administered on both groups before the experiment for equalization and to assess students’ language proficiency, then the post-test and the engagement questionnaire were applied after the experiment on both groups and statistical analysis was used to compare the results. Findings revealed that team teaching significantly improved students’ achievement and engagement compared to traditional methods. The study concludes with recommendations for integrating team teaching into ESP programs to enhance learning outcomes.

References

- Appleton, J.J., S.L. Christenson, D. Kim, A.L. Reschly Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44 (5) (2006), pp. 427-445

- Association of American Colleges, 1994. Strong foundations: Twelve principles for effective general education programs. Washington, DC.

- Austin, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about co-teaching. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 245-255.

- Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes.

- Bess, J 2000, ‘Integrating autonomous professionals through team-teaching’ in Bess, J. L. (eds.) Teaching alone, teaching together: Transforming the structure of teams for teaching, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

- Buckley, F. J. (2000). Team teaching: What, why and how? California: Sage, Thousand Oaks.

- Davis, J 1995, Interdisciplinary courses and team-teaching: New arrangements for learning, ACE/Oryx: Phoenix.

- Degan, J. C. (2018). Stronger Together: A Case for Team Teaching in the Elementary School Setting.

- Friend, M., Cook, L., Hurley-Chamberlain, D., & Shamberger, C. (2010). Co-teaching: An illustration of the complexity of collaboration in special education. Journal of educational and psychological consultation, 20(1), 9-27.‏

- Gabelnick, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R. S., & Smith, B. L. (1990). Learning community models. New directions for teaching and learning, 41, 19-37.‏

- George, M. A., & Davis-Wiley, P. (2000). Team teaching a graduate course: Case study: A clinical research course. College teaching, 48(2), 75-80.‏

- Goetz, K. (2000). Perspectives on team teaching. Egallery, 1(4). [retrieved 1 Sep 2004, verified 29 Jan 2005] http://www.ucalgary.ca/~egallery/goetz.html

- Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Pearson Education.

- Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford University Press.

- Helms, M, Alvis, J, & Willis, M, (2005), Planning and implementing shared teaching: An MBA team-teaching case study. Journal of Education for Business. September/October, 29-34.

- Hinton, S & downing, J, (1998), Team teaching a college core foundations course: Instructors’ and students’ assessments. Richmond, KY: Eastern Kentucky University. ERIC document No. ED 429469.

- Jacob, H.S., Honey, R. & Jordan, C. (2002). Getting the most out of sequential teaching. Focusing on the Student. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 5-6 February 2002. Perth: Edith Cowan University. http://www.ecu.edu.au/conferences/tlf/2002/pub/docs/Jacob.pdf

- Kennedy, C. (1980). Team teaching in ESP: A review of collaborative practices.

- Kochar, W.T., 2000. Successful inclusion: Practical strategies for a shared responsibility. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

- Lesely, L., 2007. Secondary students’ attitudes towards cooperation in language curriculum and future effects. Journal of Teaching, 4(6): 105-145.

- Liu, L., 2008. Cooperative teaching between native and non-native English teacher: An exploration of cooperative teaching models and strategies in Chinese primary schools’ context. Reflection on English Language Teaching, 7(2): 103-118.

- Mason, J. C. (1992). Business schools: Striving to meet customer demand. Management Review, 81(9), 10-14.

- McDaniel, E & Colarulli, G (1997), ‘Collaborative teaching in the face of productivity concerns:The dispersed team model’, Innovative Higher Education, 22(1), 19-36.

- Oxford University Press (2002). New Headway English Course Beginner.

- Rinn, F, & Weir, S, 1984, Yea, team. Improving college and university teaching, 32(1), 5-10.

- Salim A. H. (2025). Art based pedagogy in Teaching Conversation at University Level. Lark 17 (1), 882-906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.3969.

- Soars J., & Soars L. (2014). New Headway Plus Beginner. Oxford University Press.

- Vogler, E. and E. Long, 2003. Team teaching two sections of the same undergraduate course: A case study. College Teaching, 4(3): 122-126.

- Wilson, G. L., & Michaels, C. A. (2006). General and special education students’ perceptions of co-teaching: Implications for Secondary-level literacy instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 22, 205-225.

- Wilson, V & Martin, K, (1998), Practicing what we preach: Team teaching at the college level. Muskingum, Ohio: Muskingum College. ERIC Document No. ED 417172.

- Zhang, J & Keim, M. (1993), ‘Peer coaching, peer tutoring and team-teaching’, College Student Journal, 27, 288-293.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

Issue

Section

Western languages ​​and literature

How to Cite

Hanan Dhia Alsalihi, A. P. D. (2025). Team Teaching Instruction Effectiveness on ESP Students’ Achievement in New Headway Plus Book for Beginners. Lark, 17(3), 1695-1667. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.4319