مرافعات ضد الاستشراق
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol2.Iss29.327Abstract
In spite of that leap of Orientalism, that is, out of the traditional classical research potency to modernity, most orientalists were influenced by the materialistic tendency that prevailed in Europe. They applied the descriptive methodology of the humanities, including the Islamic sciences, and some of their research came wrong, The curriculum and how to apply it, as well as the vast gap between the environment of the applied curriculum and the environment of the subject of study between the orientalist environment and the environment of the Islamic East. �In the face of these distortions and inclinations, in the origin of the curriculum and its applications, a question arises: What are these approaches that Orientalists claim to rely on in their writings? Are they all valid for all research topics? Meaning: Are natural science curricula applicable to human sciences? Is it true that human sciences can subject science and knowledge to the unknown? In other words, is the curriculum consistent with the subject of the study? Therefore, Orientalists used a number of curricula in their studies of Islam, including those that are compatible with the Arab mood, including what is not compatible،
