Domestic Violence in Iraq: A Critical discourse analysis of passivization and gender inequality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol1.Iss44.2059

Keywords:

Critical discourse analysis, domestic violence, gender inequality

Abstract

        Women usually experience more incidents of violence than men particularly domestic violence (DV). DV includes different forms of family violence such as forced marriage and honor crimes that are perpetrated by family members. In this regard, this study intends to investigate Non-governmental Organizations (NGOs) reports on DV in Iraq through the critical discourse analysis (CDA) approach. This article aims to explore the functional descriptions of the reports' language on DV and to uncover the ideology of gender inequality causes. To achieve the aims , an eclectic modal is adopted including Halliday's (1985, 1994, 2004) systemic functional linguistics (SFL) along with Fairclough's (1992, 1995, 2001) three-dimensional framework for the analysis of the linguistic devices to examine gender inequality in NGOs reports on DV. The article is conducted through the qualitative method approach. Moreover, the data tackled two reports representing DV in Iraq and presented by the Organization of Women’s Freedom in Iraq (OWFI). The conclusions indicate that there is an increased use of passive voice to talk about violence caused by male perpetrators. Further, presuppositions and references reveal that CDA can explore the relationships among language, and the ideology of gender inequality.

References

Ahmed, A. R. (2008). Reference as a Cohesive Device. Adab Al-Rafidayn, 52, 512-537.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (4th ed.). United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc.

Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power, (1st ed.). London: Longman.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Cammeray, NSW: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English: Longman group Ltd.

Kress, G., and Hodge, R. (1979). Language as Ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.

Matsukura, N. (2004). On passive occurring in newspaper headlines. English Linguistic, 11, 147-152.

OWFI. (2015). Women’s Human Rights Violations in Iraq, in Response to the Fourth Periodic Report of the Republic of Iraq. UN ICESCR, 56 Session, Geneva, Switzerland, 21 September–9 October 2015

Quirk, R. & et al. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of English Language. London: Longman.

Reisigl, M & Wodak, R. (2000). The semiotics of racism: Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.

Rogers, R. (2004). An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis in Education, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Suhadi, J. (2017). Epistemic modality and deontic modality: Two sides of a coin. Indonesia: Islamic University of North Sumatra.

UNICEF. (2017). Monitoring the Situation of Children and Women https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/child-marriage/

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

Issue

Section

west languages

How to Cite

Maleka D. Hasan, M. S., & Farah Abduljabbar Almnaseer, A. (2021). Domestic Violence in Iraq: A Critical discourse analysis of passivization and gender inequality. Lark, 13(5), 1052-1037. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol1.Iss44.2059