Mechanisms of cognitive analysis of discourse in the Russian language

Authors

  • Asst. Prof. Dr. Samer Akram Hussain Department of Russian Language, Faculty of Languages, University of Baghdad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.3836

Keywords:

Discourse, discourse analysis, communication, speech, text, knowledge

Abstract

The term "discourse" appeared due to its entry into the field of supersyntax of various linguistic studies, i.e. beyond the sentences. Thus, discourse from the point of view of linguistics is a systematic unit of a certain sequence of sentences connected by meaning.

Active search for discourse structures similar to sentence structures so far has not led to significant theoretical generalizations due to the high complexity and multifaceted nature of the phenomenon under study.

However, the concept of discourse is firmly established in modern linguistics, displacing a similar concept of coherent speech, which was previously widely used in sociology, cultural studies, philosophy, political science and even psychoanalysis.

Linguistics, which analyzes discourse, is inseparable from language as a fundamental subject. Discourse should be understood as a new feature of linguistic manifestation since the end of the twentieth century (Stepanova, 1996:71). Language in the form of discourse has revealed its dynamic, regularly changing aspect to linguists. This, of course, requires the search for qualitatively new research methods. The high importance of the subject of this study is explained by this circumstance.

Scientific Modernity

The initial research in the field of discourse organization was recorded in the early fifties of the last century. Then the first scientific publications devoted to constructions that include more than one sentence or so-called “superunits” appeared.

This study is among the modern research on the subject of discourse, which has long become complex and precise, intertwined in all sciences.

Author Biography

  • Asst. Prof. Dr. Samer Akram Hussain , Department of Russian Language, Faculty of Languages, University of Baghdad

    تدريسي في قسم اللغة الروسية/كلية اللغات/ جامعة بغداد

References

Список используемой литературы

Борботько В.Г. Принципы формирования дискурса: От психолингвистики к лингвосинергетике. – М.: КомКнига, 2006. с.288 Borbotko V.G. Principles of Discourse Formation: From Psycholinguistics to Linguosynergetics. – M.: KomKniga, 2006. p.288

Бурвикова (Зарубина) Н.В. Закономерности линейной структуры монологического текста/Автореф. дис. докт. филол. наук. – М., 1981. – 41 с. Burvikova (Zarubina) N.V. Regularities of the Linear Structure of a Monologue Text/Abstract of a Doctor of Philological Sciences Dissertation. – M., 1981. – 41 p.

Ван Дейк Т.А. К определению дискурса. - Л.: Сэйдж пабликэйшнс, 1998. - 384 с. Van Dijk T.A. Towards the Definition of Discourse. - L.: Sage Publications, 1998. - 384 p.

Демьянков В.З. Доминирующие лингвистические теории в конце XX века // Язык и наука конца XX века. - М.: Ин-т языкознания РАН, 1995. - С. 239-320. Demyankov V.Z. Dominant Linguistic Theories at the End of the 20th Century // Language and Science at the End of the 20th Century. – M.: Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1995. – P.239-320.

Кибрик А.Е., Паршин П.Б. Дискурс // Кругосвет: Рол-Энцикл. // http://www.krugosvet.ru/articles/82/1008254/1008254a2.htm Kibrik A.E., Parshin P.B. Discourse // Krugosvet: Rol-Encyclopedia. // http://www.krugosvet.ru/articles/82/1008254/1008254a2.htm

Кириллова Л.Е. Понятие дискурс: Единство во множественном // Социальные и гуманитарные науки на Дальнем Востоке. 2006. № 4. Kirillova L.E. The concept of discourse: Unity in the plural // Social and humanitarian sciences in the Far East. 2006. No. 4.

Леонтьев А.А. Актуальное членение и способы его выражения в русском языке // Теория языка, методы его исследования и преподавания. – Л.: Наука, 1981. – 291 с. . Leontiev A.A. Actual division and ways of its expression in the Russian language // Theory of language, methods of its research and teaching. - L.: Science, 1981. - 291 p.

Мальковская И.А. Знак коммуникации: Дикурсивные матрицы. М., 2004. Malkovskaya I.A. Communication sign: Discursive matrices. M., 2004.

Николаева Т.М. Краткий словарь терминов лингвистики. - М.: Прогресс, 1978. -480 с. Nikolaeva T.M. Brief dictionary of linguistic terms. - M.: Progress, 1978. -480 p.

Одинцов В.В. Стилистика текста. – М.: Наука, 1980. – 263 с.; 3-е изд. – М.: КомКнига/URSS, 2006. Odintsov V.V. Stylistics of the text. - M.: Nauka, 1980. - 263 p.; 3rd ed. - M.: KomKniga/URSS, 2006.

Поляков А.В. Российский правовой дискурс и идея коммуникации: Учеб. пособие // http://law.edu.ru/script/cntsource.asp?cntID=100018617 Polyakov A.V. Russian legal discourse and the idea of communication: Textbook // http://law.edu.ru/script/cntsource.asp?cntID=100018617

Потапова Р.К., Потапов В.В.Семантическое поле «наркотики»: Дискурс как объект прикладной лингвистики. М., 2004. Potapova R.K., Potapov V.V. Semantic field "drugs": Discourse as an object of applied linguistics. M., 2004.

Степанов Ю.С. Альтернативный мир, Дискурс, Фпкт и Принцип причинности // Язык и наука конца 20 века. М.: РАН, 1996. – С. 35-73 Stepanov Yu.S. Alternative world, Discourse, Fpct and the Principle of causality // Language and science of the late 20th century. M.: RAS, 1996. – P. 35-73

Серио П. Анализ дискурса во французской школе [Дискурс и интердискурс] // Семиотика: Антология. Сост. Ю.С.Степанов. Изд. 2-е, испр. и доп. М., Екатеринбург, 2001. Serio P. Discourse Analysis in the French School [Discourse and Interdiscourse] // Semiotics: Anthology. Comp. Yu.S.Stepanov. 2nd ed., corrected. and add. M., Ekaterinburg, 2001.

Сусов И.П. Введение в теоретическое языкознание: Электронный учебник // http://rus-kafedra.freenet.tj/guests.html. Susov I.P. Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics: Electronic textbook // http://rus-kafedra.freenet.tj/guests.html.

Тодоров Ц. Понятие литературы // Семиотика. – М.: Радуга, 1983. – С. 355-369. Todorov Ts. The Concept of Literature // Semiotics. – M.: Raduga, 1983. – P. 355-369.

Фигуровский И.А. Основные направления в исследованиях синтаксиса связного текста // Лингвистика текста. Материалы научной конф. Ч. II. – М.: МГПИИЯ им. М. Тореза, 1974. – С. 108-115. Figurovsky I.A. Main Directions in Research of Coherent Text Syntax // Text Linguistics. Proceedings of the Scientific Conf. Part II. – M.: Moscow State Pedagogical Institute of Languages. M. Thorez, 1974. – P. 108-115.

Хишам Али Хуссейн, К вопросу переводе медия термина с русского на арабский (язык русский СМИ, газета ЛАРК, https://lark.uowasit.edu.iq стр. 774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31185/, 18. Hisham Ali Hussein, On the issue of translating the media term from Russian into Arabic (Russian media language, LARК newspaper, https://lark.uowasit.edu.iq p. 774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31185/

Щерба Л. В. Языковая система и речевая деятельность. – Л.: Наука, 1974. – 428 с; 2-е изд. – М.: УРСС, 2004. . Shcherba L. V. Language system and speech activity. – L.: Nauka, 1974. – 428 p; 2nd ed. – M.: URSS, 2004.

Buyssens E. La communication et l’articulation linguistique. – Bruxelles: Presses Universitaires, 1970. – 175 p. Buyssens E. Communication and articulation linguistique. – Bruxelles: Presses Universitaires, 1970. – 175p.

Mahmoudian M. La linguistique. – Paris: Seghers, 1982. – 239 p.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-01

How to Cite

Samer Akram Hussain , A. P. D. . . (2024). Mechanisms of cognitive analysis of discourse in the Russian language. Lark, 16(4 /Pt1), 771-760. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.3836