An Investigation of MERGING Image Schema: A Cognitive Semantic PerspectiveThis study is based on the content analysis method. It is qualitative, descriptive and analytical. Its main goal is to explore MERGING Image Schema as it is one of the image schemas that are recognized as significant constituents in humans’ cognitive system and their creative thinking. Image schema theory can be considered as an advanced way of inspection into a nonobjective and sensorimotor experiences. This image schema is dealt with by scholars who are interested in cognitive studies but in this study, the researchers attempt to introduce and involve many authentic perspectives and formalizing new subcategories to it in addition to setting up their visual representations as a way of schematizing their structures and explaining their unique cognitive models. The study comes up with important conclusions. The most essential one is that MERGING image schema can be described as consisting of entities that have kinetic energy. These entities are flexible involved in a SOURCE-PATH-GOAL schema caused by a FORCE to integrate these entities, thus to be in CONTACT and then MERGING together into an entirely new entity either in its internal or external structure or evolving features of the original constitutive entities. Consequently, this schema involves sequential processes of integration and addition.

Authors

  • Lect.Sanaa Yousif Ahmed Al-Jorani Salahaddin University-Erbil / College of Engineering
  • Dr. Ismail Abdulrahman Abdulla Erbil Technical Administration Institute /Department of Translation Techniques

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.3740

Keywords:

Cognitive Semantics, Image Schema, MERGING image schema

Abstract

This study is based on the content analysis method. It is qualitative, descriptive and analytical. Its main goal is to explore MERGING Image Schema as it is one of the image schemas that are recognized as significant constituents in humans’ cognitive system and their creative thinking. Image schema theory can be considered as an advanced way of inspection into a nonobjective and sensorimotor experiences. This image schema is dealt with by scholars who are interested in cognitive studies but in this study, the researchers attempt to introduce and involve many authentic perspectives and formalizing new subcategories to it in addition to setting up their visual representations as a way of schematizing their structures and explaining their unique cognitive models. The study comes up with important conclusions. The most essential one is that MERGING image schema can be described as consisting of entities that have kinetic energy. These entities are flexible involved in a SOURCE-PATH-GOAL schema caused by a FORCE to integrate these entities, thus to be in CONTACT and then MERGING together into an entirely new entity either in its internal or external structure or evolving features of the original constitutive entities. Consequently, this schema involves sequential processes of integration and addition.

References

References

Behr, M., et al. 1986. Part-Whole and Equalized-Wholes Schemata for Qualitative and Quantitative Proportional Reasoning. (Manuscript submitted for publication). In: A Taxonomy of Part-Whole Relations. Morton E. Winston, and Douglas Herrmann. 1987.. COGNITIVE SCIENCE 11, 417-444.

Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. xix-341.

Liu, J., Wang, X., & Zhang, M. (1984). “The part-whole relationships concerning number and arithmetic”. In H.W. Stevenson & Q. Jing (Eds.), Issues in cognition: Proceedings of a joint conference in psychology. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

Smith, Barry & Mulligan, Kevin. 1982. “Pieces of a Theory”. In: Parts and Moments Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology. Philosophia Verlag. pp. 15-109 Saeed, John I. 2016. Semantics. Fourth Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Mathewson, S. T. Tsoneva. 2004. “COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS”. In: Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO. EOLSS Publishers. Oxford. http://www.eolss.net.

Johnson, Mark, 1987. The Body in the Mind. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hedblom, Maria M.; Kutz, Oliver & Neuhaus, Fabian. 2015. “Choosing the Right Path: Image Schema Theory as a Foundation for Concept Invention”. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 6(1) 21-54. https://doi.ord/10.1515/jagi-2015-0003

Omar, Ali Wally. 2024. “Double-Standard Reporting: A Critical Study of the Discourse on London (2017) Attacks in British Press”. LARK, College of Art, Wasit University. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol1.Iss52.3325

Szwedek, Aleksander. 2018. “The Image Schema: A Definition. STYLES OF COMMUNICATION”. Vol.11, no.1. pp.7-28. https://www.researchgate.net

Winston, Morton E. and Herrmann, Douglas. 1987. A Taxonomy of Part-Whole Relations. COGNITIVE SCIENCE. Vol.11, pp.417-444. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1104_2

Warchoł, Adam Tomasz. 2018. “Conceptual Blending and the Arts: An Analysis of Michał Batory’s Posters”. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-01

How to Cite

Sanaa Yousif Ahmed Al-Jorani, L., & Ismail Abdulrahman Abdulla, D. (2024). An Investigation of MERGING Image Schema: A Cognitive Semantic PerspectiveThis study is based on the content analysis method. It is qualitative, descriptive and analytical. Its main goal is to explore MERGING Image Schema as it is one of the image schemas that are recognized as significant constituents in humans’ cognitive system and their creative thinking. Image schema theory can be considered as an advanced way of inspection into a nonobjective and sensorimotor experiences. This image schema is dealt with by scholars who are interested in cognitive studies but in this study, the researchers attempt to introduce and involve many authentic perspectives and formalizing new subcategories to it in addition to setting up their visual representations as a way of schematizing their structures and explaining their unique cognitive models. The study comes up with important conclusions. The most essential one is that MERGING image schema can be described as consisting of entities that have kinetic energy. These entities are flexible involved in a SOURCE-PATH-GOAL schema caused by a FORCE to integrate these entities, thus to be in CONTACT and then MERGING together into an entirely new entity either in its internal or external structure or evolving features of the original constitutive entities. Consequently, this schema involves sequential processes of integration and addition. Lark, 16(4 /Pt1), 832-822. https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.3740