Solidarity in Prophet Muhammad’s Safe Conduct to Non-muslims: A Positive Discourse Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31185/lark.Vol2.Iss50.3043Keywords:
Key word: positive discourse analysis, solidarity, thematic analysis, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), promiseAbstract
This paper studies solidarity through thematic analysis within the positive framework of discourse analysis. Despite the fact that there are countless traces of solidarity in Prophet Muhammad's (Peace Be Upon Him and His Family) (henceforth PBUH) tradition, the author discovers a severe deficiency in researches investigating Prophet Muhammad's (PBUH) safe conducts in the field of positive discourse analysis. In this line, it is decided to scrutinize solidarity in Prophet Muhammad's (PBUH) safe conduct to non-Muslims. Firstly, a brief introduction that embraces the question, the aim and the hypothesis understudy is engaged. Secondly, positive discourse analysis is introduced according to several sources all of which approve that not all discourses are negative. Thirdly, the concept of solidarity and the criteria of thematic analysis are conducted and then the qualitative thematic analysis is followed by the quantitative inspection. Finally, results that signify traces of solidarity in the discourse understudy are qualitatively illustrated and quantitatively presented. The table demonstrates statistical result more evidently.
Key word: positive discourse analysis, solidarity, thematic analysis, Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), promise
References
Works Cited
Azizan, M., Ismail, H., and Qaiwer, Sh. 2020. "Power and Solidarity in Positive
Facebook Postings Amidst Covid-19 in Malaysia." Journal of Nusantara
Studies 2020, Vol 5 (2) 329-364.
Baker, P., and Ellece, S. 2011. Key terms in Discourse Analysis. London and New
York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology,
Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3 (2). 77- 101.
Hughes, J. M. F. 2018. "Progressing Positive Discourse Analysis and/ in Critical
Discourse Studies: Reconstructing Resistance through progressive
Discourse Analysis." Review of Communication, 18 (3), 193-211.
Laitinen, A., and Pessi, A. B., 2015. An Introduction. In A. Laitinen and A. B.
Pessi (Eds): Solidarity: Theory and Practice. 1-29. Lexington Books.
Lindenberg, Siegwart. 1998. "Solidarity: its Microfoundations and
Macrodependence. A Framing Approach." In T.J. Fararo and P. Doreian
(Eds): The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models. Amsterdam:
Gordon and Breach Publishers. 61-112.
……………………… . 2006. "Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity, and Framing
Processes." In D. Fetchenhauer, A. flache, A. P. Buunk, and S. Lindenberg
(Eds): Solidarity and prosocial Behavior. 23- 44.
Macgilchrist, F. 2007. "Positive Discourse Analysis: Contesting Dominant
Discourses by Reframing the Issues." Critical Approaches to Discourse
Analysis Across Disciplines, 1 (1). 74-94.
Martin, J. R. 2004. "Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and Change." Revista
Canaria de Estadios Ingleses. 49 (1). 179- 200.
Martin, J. R., and Rose, D. 2003. Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the
Clause. Continuum.
Salmela, Mikko. 2014. "Collective Emotions as 'the Glue' of Group Solidarity." In
A. Laitinen and A.B. Pessi (Eds): Solidarity: Theory and Practice. Lanham:
Lexington Books.
Scheff, Thomas. 1997. Emotions, the Social Bond, and Human Reality.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
الشيرازي. سيد حسن. 1966. موسوعة الكلمة, كلمة الرسول الأعظم صلى الله عليه و اله. بولس سلامة: لبنان.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Assistant Lecturer Hawraa Farhan Mohammad Jawad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
